I have mixed feelings about this Wikileaks business. On the one hand, I have no problem with keeping secrets that protect our troops and national security. On the other hand, it appears that the bulk of these classified documents are not of that nature. It looks like most of them are simply embarrassments resulting from indiscretions and prejudices expressed on the part of fools in our diplomatic corps. Those are appropriately exposed; tell us the truth about our State Department; and should result in rolled heads.
I have no problem with our secret keepers being exposed for the things they do that have lead others to regard us as Ugly Americans. The politically manipulative shenanigans they do in the name of advancing American interests are wrong and ultimately destructive to our position in the world. Problem is, I have little hope that this exposure will change a thing. So far damage control has been riddled with a lot of spin and very little apologetic humility. It is especially concerning since attempts are being made to remove the threat of dark deeds being brought into the light. Attempts being made to censor the internet in order to prevent further embarrassment (in the name of security) are going to intrude on our access to the truth. If we are not careful the government will gladly further erode the guarantees of the First Amendment.
During his campaign President Obama promised transparency in the government. So far Wikileaks has provided far more transparency than Obama has.
During all of this I am also displeased with the government for their inability of manage their own affairs. This current batch of leaked documents has been blamed on an Army Private. In what world is a Private given access to classified documents? Holy Cow! This kind of incompetence in Federal affairs is rampant across the board. Such revelations are not only embarrassing to them, but to me.
Well did Jesus say, "ye shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free." Free press should be about telling us the truth. I strongly suspect that the main stream media has abandoned that notion, much to the satisfaction of the political machine. No wonder everyone is ganging up on Wikileaks.
I believe in abiding by the law. I believe in protecting our National interests and most especially, our troops in the field. I don't not believe in seeking to hide our own sins and much of what we've been shown are clearly in the category of sins being hidden.
Thursday, December 9, 2010
Try A Great New Browser Called RockMelt
Try RockMelt! It the best browser yet! Much like Chrome, but much more versatile. You can surf the web and never miss a thing on Facebook at the same time. It is handy, intuitive and fast!
So far you can only get it by invitation. If you'd like to be invited comment below with and include your email address and I'll sent you one! You'll love it.
Monday, December 6, 2010
Want to Do a Flash Mob?
I'm investigating the production of a Flash Mob in the Vernal Area. If you are interested leave a comment. I need about forty serious participants plus a production crew. I think it will be a ball. I'd like to use it to benefit the Food Pantry for Christmas.
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Book Review - Odds Are You're Going To Be Exalted by Alonzo L Gaskill
When I first saw this book, I thought the title to be a bit cheesy and left it on the shelf. It sort of sounded like we were gambling with our exaltation. Sometime later, I decided to give it a try and I'm so glad I did. The uses of the term odds, has nothing to do with gambling and everything to do with statistical likelihood.
I'll be keeping this one just for the references. Gaskill has found more quotations from prophets on the subject than I ever thought existed. I've long held that the likelihood of Exaltation was greater than the typical Latter-day Saint suspects, but the author makes it plain that such a happy result is far greater than I ever anticipated.
This is one of the most optimistic, hopeful volumes I've ever read. Mostly that is true because it also one of the best treatments on the Plan of Salvation I've ever encountered. God is intent on the salvation of all of his children. He is a perfect parent. He will succeed in His mission to bring His children home. Gaskill makes it plain that every one who wants to go home to live with God will be afforded that blessing. Even those who don't currently want to are likely to have a change of heart in that regard and the world was designed to make it so. What a wonderful promise to the posterity of God, "For behold it is my work and my glory to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man. (Moses 1:39) He is quite capable of accomplishing that task.
If you are doubtful as to your own possibility of reaching Heaven; if you have loved ones who don't seem headed in that direction at all; this book is especially for you.
Five Stars
Monday, November 15, 2010
More Observations on the Utah Compact
A Dan Jones poll has indicated that the majority of Utahns are still determined to have an Arizona style immigration policy. This despite the fact that the LDS Church stood in support of the Utah Pact on Immigration. (Read their statement here.) 60% of Utahns are LDS. I find it interesting that the LDS Church consistently comes down more moderately on the issues than her members do. This says a couple of interesting things to me.
First, there is room for disagreement in the church. As Joseph Smith put it, "I teach them correct principles and they govern themselves." That leaves the door open to them to misgovern themselves as well. Outsiders tend to look at us as being in a very restrictive society in which we all march to the beat of the Brethren. The present issue seems to indicate otherwise. I don't expect anyone will be excommunicated for disagreeing with the Brethren on this issue. After the close of WWI Congress was embroiled in a debate as to whether the United States should participate in the League of Nations. President Heber J. Grant was in favor of joining the League, Apostle and Senator Reed Smoot was not in favor. Smoot, of course had more influence in the decision and voted against America's involvement. There was clear and obvious disagreement between these two, and several other, church leaders. It did not adversely affect their relationship as members of the highest councils of the church.
The second, item of interest is the very apparent fact that the members tend to be more conservative than their leaders on a number of issues. My personal impression, indeed my belief, is that not only do these men in the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve receive revelation; they are also astute, well educated and better yet, well informed on the issues. Long experience has shown that we rarely get knee jerk reactions from Church Headquarters. The last one I recall came during the Mark Hoffman forgery fiasco. Lesson learned. The Church's leaders are much more careful in their reaction to the events and circumstances that surround us.
My conversations with most radically right winged Latter-day Saints do not indicate that they are well informed. They may be well indoctrinated by the likes of Glen Beck, Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh, but rarely do I encounter one who has rationally considered the alternative or even more moderate point of view. For this reason I whole heartedly applaud KSL radio for dumping Hannity in favor of less inflammatory Jay McFarland.
This is not to say that I entirely disagree with the big three conservative commentators. I just disagree with the "us vs them" approach that they seem to be fostering. Seldom to I hear these or other conservative voices consider the consequences to the poor, outcast, alien and disadvantaged among us. Their mantra seems to be focused entirely on how this all affects ME. They not only defend big business, they are big business. Don't get me wrong I am all in favor or free enterprise. It's just that is becoming more and more apparent that big money is running this country, not citizens.
I was so grateful that thinking people stepped forward with the Utah Compact in a rational and well considered way. In doing so they acknowledge the existence of serious problems, but cautioned us to avoid throwing the baby out with the bath water. There are real people involved in these issues. People who put their pants on one leg at a time just like we do. Fathers and Mothers who love their children. Children who want stable families and a chance to grow and an opportunity to succeed. When we consider cleaning things up in this country, let us please consider the baby.
First, there is room for disagreement in the church. As Joseph Smith put it, "I teach them correct principles and they govern themselves." That leaves the door open to them to misgovern themselves as well. Outsiders tend to look at us as being in a very restrictive society in which we all march to the beat of the Brethren. The present issue seems to indicate otherwise. I don't expect anyone will be excommunicated for disagreeing with the Brethren on this issue. After the close of WWI Congress was embroiled in a debate as to whether the United States should participate in the League of Nations. President Heber J. Grant was in favor of joining the League, Apostle and Senator Reed Smoot was not in favor. Smoot, of course had more influence in the decision and voted against America's involvement. There was clear and obvious disagreement between these two, and several other, church leaders. It did not adversely affect their relationship as members of the highest councils of the church.
The second, item of interest is the very apparent fact that the members tend to be more conservative than their leaders on a number of issues. My personal impression, indeed my belief, is that not only do these men in the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve receive revelation; they are also astute, well educated and better yet, well informed on the issues. Long experience has shown that we rarely get knee jerk reactions from Church Headquarters. The last one I recall came during the Mark Hoffman forgery fiasco. Lesson learned. The Church's leaders are much more careful in their reaction to the events and circumstances that surround us.
My conversations with most radically right winged Latter-day Saints do not indicate that they are well informed. They may be well indoctrinated by the likes of Glen Beck, Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh, but rarely do I encounter one who has rationally considered the alternative or even more moderate point of view. For this reason I whole heartedly applaud KSL radio for dumping Hannity in favor of less inflammatory Jay McFarland.
This is not to say that I entirely disagree with the big three conservative commentators. I just disagree with the "us vs them" approach that they seem to be fostering. Seldom to I hear these or other conservative voices consider the consequences to the poor, outcast, alien and disadvantaged among us. Their mantra seems to be focused entirely on how this all affects ME. They not only defend big business, they are big business. Don't get me wrong I am all in favor or free enterprise. It's just that is becoming more and more apparent that big money is running this country, not citizens.
I was so grateful that thinking people stepped forward with the Utah Compact in a rational and well considered way. In doing so they acknowledge the existence of serious problems, but cautioned us to avoid throwing the baby out with the bath water. There are real people involved in these issues. People who put their pants on one leg at a time just like we do. Fathers and Mothers who love their children. Children who want stable families and a chance to grow and an opportunity to succeed. When we consider cleaning things up in this country, let us please consider the baby.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)